A bit of an old post here, but I've been thinking about these areas. This was written about a month and a half ago, after I read The Gender Knot, which has to be one of the best works on gender in circulation at present. It may be a bit dated, but here it goes. Things in India have, regrettably, not changed, and both male and female culture need to change.
Enough has been said, justifiably, about the
despicable treatment of women in India. The horrific rape and murder in Delhi
in December was followed by a massive public demand for justice, and the recent
gang-rape of a university student in Manipal has set off similar protests in
Mangalore. The clamor for justice is absolutely justified – in these and
ceaseless other crimes of violence against women, the perpetrators must be
caught and incarcerated. However, no amount of punishment, not even the death
penalty, will stop these crimes from continuing, or bring about true justice.
The real issue lies with the culture in which men grow up, and it’s not about
how men treat women in particular, but with how men see themselves and their
world in general. As sociologist Allan G. Johnson put it, we can explain
individual acts of violence as the work of sick or angry men, but we should
really ask what sort of society causes such male anger and causes it to be
directed against women.
Boys are taught to ‘be a man’ from their early
school years. Sensitive kids are routinely scolded by parents and teachers and
told to become tough. Bullies pick on them. As they grow into teenagers,
cliques form, led by the boy who demonstrates his macho-ness the most, through
acts of physical strength, tough-talk, or blatant indiscipline in the class. Conformity
is imposed; differences of any sort are frowned upon. Academic pressure grows. The
ability to stay in control and control others (through force or otherwise),
becomes a higher virtue than having a happy, adjusted life or a proper sense of
self-worth. We take this sort of ‘competitiveness’ in schools and colleges for
granted, and even encourage it at the cost of such things as empathy and
emotional development.
Girls are often kept aside, treated in
practical terms as the property of the ‘tough’ or ‘cool’ guys. It becomes worse
in college, where first-years are ragged by seniors in any manner of insidious
ways, where seniors overtly exert power over juniors and junior girls are objects
of desire. Boys fight over girls as a status symbol, and girls, conditioned to
see this kind of behavior as ‘normal’, and frightened by the violence involved,
step aside. Now, this is certainly not the trend where boys and girls interact
with each other more (and therefore see each other as human beings), but with
grossly skewed sex ratios in many schools and engineering colleges in India,
girlfriends become valuable trophies – and there is nothing like winning a hot
girlfriend to boost a young man’s social status.
Men who feel constantly under control and who
have no luck finding girls grow increasingly frustrated. They want the trophies
that they have been taught are theirs (a hot, young, intelligent girlfriend or
wife) and want to get those trophies through methods they think are legitimate
(violence), driven on by a growing sense of shame and inadequacy. Their desires
are constantly renewed by endless ‘escapist’ movies and posters and
advertisements showing men in a position of dominance, and females as objects
of desire. These forms of media portray as well as shape real-life gender
expectations, and fan the flames of frustrated men.
Broken, utterly lacking in self-worth, angry,
and ashamed of themselves, these men would have been pitiable if they didn’t
choose to satisfy their broken egos through attacks on women. Women are ‘the
other’, inferior, things through which one can prove their self-worth and their
manliness. They don’t see the women on the other end as human beings – the
women they rape are just tools to
them. This goes for the other, less violent forms of sexism as well – women are
treated as things to use, just as a
bully uses his victims or a clique leader uses his followers as a way to boost
his self-esteem. Some of them go as far as to justify their violence against
women, in claiming that they were ‘protecting them against other men’, or
‘teaching them a lesson for being loose’. Disgusting or despicable as this may
be, none of this is extraordinary: this is how an extreme patriarchal system
justifies its gender roles.
How does one go about and deal with it?
Education is no solution, as even educated men have uttered grossly sexist
statements and committed the basest crimes against women. George Orwell pointed
out in his wonderful essay ‘What is Science?’ that an education in scientific
fact doesn’t grant anyone a scientific frame of mind. In the same vein, merely
teaching anatomy or basic sex education does not help. Toning down the present
culture of competitiveness would be impossible with the present school system.
But we can remove the associations of force and competitiveness from
masculinity. We can, as so many feminists of both sexes state, stop explicitly
or implicitly comparing our boys to girls. One thing we need to get rid of is
the notion that girls and women are some ‘other’ group. Girls are just as human
as boys, and boys need to learn that just because girls are different does not
mean that they are inferior. In schools and colleges where interaction between
the sexes is freely allowed, sexism is far less pervasive, thus making a case
for improved communication. There is a long way to go before male culture can
be changed, but we need to begin the changes – for the sake of men and women.
No comments:
Post a Comment